Showing posts with label nar. Show all posts
Showing posts with label nar. Show all posts

14 April 2011

"404 not found": a database of non-functional resources in the NAR database collection

Today, Andra Waagmeester asked on Biostar :"NAR nicely lists all their database issues on http://www.oxfordjournals.org/nar/database/c/. Is the list also available in a downloadable format?".

I suggested to download from pubmed all the articles published in an annual issue of NAR , to extract the URLs from the abstract and to check if they were still active. I just wrote a java program doing this job (it is available on github at https://github.com/lindenb/jsandbox/blob/master/src/sandbox/NucleicAcidsResearch404.java)

A few comments:

  • The connection timeout was fixed to 10 seconds.
  • Some URLs are poorly written e.g: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14681415
  • An abstract can contain more than one URL
  • There can be different URLs for the same database
  • getting a HTTP:404 error doesn't mean that the database has really been discontinued.
  • getting a status HTTP:200 doesn't mean that the database is still active and/or maintained
  • 1155 URLs have been extracted from this pubmed query `"Nucleic Acids Res"[JOUR] "Database issue"[ISS]` (as far as I can see , this query only goes to 2004) Edit:ok, that was because NCBI eFetch is limited to 10K records


YearCount(URL)count(Active)%
200415710063
200516211470
200618614779
200719415881
200820618087
200920818689
201014713692
201120019396


... a snapshot of the output...


(...)

(...)

Credit for the Title: Neil Saunders ;-)


Update:
It seems that the URLs in the abstracts are broken where they were cut in the PDF !
via openwetware.org


That's it,
Pierre

14 January 2008

Nucl. Acids Res.: Database issue, January 2008

The annual database issue of NAR is freely available at:http://nar.oxfordjournals.org/content/vol36/suppl_1/index.dtl?etoc

The 2008 update includes 1078 databases, 110 more than the previous one. The links to more than 80 databases have been updated and 25 obsolete databases have been removed from the list.

Who can say: "I'm a specialist in the databases in biology" ?